Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 581–590
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Major award
Major, internationally recognized award
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner provided only assertion and limited evidence about the global recognition of the prizes. She did not supply evidence of international media coverage, and the letters submitted did not explain how the prizes constitute top awards with global recognition. Website screenshots were general and lacked sufficient detail about the prizes and their recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner provided only assertion and limited evidence about the global recognition of the prizes. She did not supply evidence of international media coverage, and the letters submitted did not explain how the prizes constitute top awards with global recognition. Website screenshots were general and lacked sufficient detail about the prizes and their recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-28_01_B2203; source_row=44362 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO withdrew SCOPS' conclusion, finding that the Petitioner's education, expertise, published articles, citation evidence, record of success in research projects, and progress in the field demonstrated he is well positioned to advance his proposed endeavor.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew SCOPS' conclusion, finding that the Petitioner's education, expertise, published articles, citation evidence, record of success in research projects, and progress in the field demonstrated he is well positioned to advance his proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-28_05_B5203; source_row=44411 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO withdrew SCOPS' adverse finding, concluding that the Petitioner's track record of successful research and the significance of his proposed work to advance U.S. public health interests demonstrated that his contributions are of sufficient value to benefit the United States even assuming other qualified U.S. workers are available.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew SCOPS' adverse finding, concluding that the Petitioner's track record of successful research and the significance of his proposed work to advance U.S. public health interests demonstrated that his contributions are of sufficient value to benefit the United States even assuming other qualified U.S. workers are available.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-28_05_B5203; source_row=44412 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the Director's finding that this criterion was met. The Petitioner's Professional Identity Card listed him as a Telecommunications Technician registered with certain bodies, but the referenced Decree No. 23.569 covered engineers, architects, and surveyors — not telecommunications technicians. The Petitioner failed to explain the relationship between the two bodies or show the equivalent of a U.S.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding that this criterion was met. The Petitioner's Professional Identity Card listed him as a Telecommunications Technician registered with certain bodies, but the referenced Decree No. 23.569 covered engineers, architects, and surveyors — not telecommunications technicians. The Petitioner failed to explain the relationship between the two bodies or show the equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree in the occupation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-28_07_B5203; source_row=44418 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO declined to consider this newly raised criterion because the Petitioner did not assert eligibility at the initial filing or in response to the RFE, citing Matter of Furtado.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to consider this newly raised criterion because the Petitioner did not assert eligibility at the initial filing or in response to the RFE, citing Matter of Furtado.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-28_03_B2203; source_row=44381 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c