Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 811–820
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions
Why AAO was not persuaded
While reference letters praised the Petitioner's work, they lacked specific detail demonstrating the originality and major significance of his contributions. The record lacked corroborating evidence such as television ratings, published rankings, or other data showing the extent of his influence on the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
While reference letters praised the Petitioner's work, they lacked specific detail demonstrating the originality and major significance of his contributions. The record lacked corroborating evidence such as television ratings, published rankings, or other data showing the extent of his influence on the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-10_06_B2203; source_row=44046 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner did not provide evidence of box office receipts, record/video sales volume, or other measures showing commercial success relative to others in the performing arts field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not provide evidence of box office receipts, record/video sales volume, or other measures showing commercial success relative to others in the performing arts field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-10_06_B2203; source_row=44050 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner's Bolivian comedy venue award did not demonstrate national or international recognition for excellence. The Petitioner claimed but did not corroborate receipt of a nationally recognized award; letters describing the award's prestige were unsupported by official selection criteria or media coverage showing the Petitioner as a recipient.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's Bolivian comedy venue award did not demonstrate national or international recognition for excellence. The Petitioner claimed but did not corroborate receipt of a nationally recognized award; letters describing the award's prestige were unsupported by official selection criteria or media coverage showing the Petitioner as a recipient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-10_06_B2203; source_row=44043 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Commanded a salary demonstrating exceptional ability (criterion D)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's salary from his primary employer was consistent with the average salary documented in the record and was not above average. Comparative salary data was provided for a different geographic market than where the Petitioner worked, and no comparative data was provided for his work in Brazil. Post-filing employment salary was excluded.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's salary from his primary employer was consistent with the average salary documented in the record and was not above average. Comparative salary data was provided for a different geographic market than where the Petitioner worked, and no comparative data was provided for his work in Brazil. Post-filing employment salary was excluded.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-10_03_B5203; source_row=44020 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Membership in professional associations (criterion E)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not provide evidence that the association requires at least a U.S. baccalaureate degree or its foreign equivalent as a minimum requirement for membership, and therefore failed to establish that it constitutes a 'professional association' as contemplated by the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not provide evidence that the association requires at least a U.S. baccalaureate degree or its foreign equivalent as a minimum requirement for membership, and therefore failed to establish that it constitutes a 'professional association' as contemplated by the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-10_03_B5203; source_row=44021 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Director found merit but not national importance. The AAO agreed the record did not establish national importance: the Petitioner's claims relied on the general importance of the IT field rather than the specific prospective impact of his work, and he did not show broader implications beyond his prospective customers, significant potential to employ U.S.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The Director found merit but not national importance. The AAO agreed the record did not establish national importance: the Petitioner's claims relied on the general importance of the IT field rather than the specific prospective impact of his work, and he did not show broader implications beyond his prospective customers, significant potential to employ U.S. workers, or substantial positive economic effects attributable to his specific endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-10_03_B5203; source_row=44023 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that neither the senior lawyer nor law firm partner positions were fair comparators because the Petitioner's income derives from a combination of legal services, law firm ownership, and a separate consulting firm, making valid comparison to either category impossible. The Petitioner failed to provide data on remuneration of other self-employed attorneys.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that neither the senior lawyer nor law firm partner positions were fair comparators because the Petitioner's income derives from a combination of legal services, law firm ownership, and a separate consulting firm, making valid comparison to either category impossible. The Petitioner failed to provide data on remuneration of other self-employed attorneys.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-10_05_B2203; source_row=44039 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
Several certificates were not clearly awards for excellence in the field; the 'Female Personality of the Year' criteria were not field-specific; the multi-tier organization's awards lacked context establishing significance; and the 'Global Quality Certification' did not reflect excellence in the Petitioner's specific field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Several certificates were not clearly awards for excellence in the field; the 'Female Personality of the Year' criteria were not field-specific; the multi-tier organization's awards lacked context establishing significance; and the 'Global Quality Certification' did not reflect excellence in the Petitioner's specific field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-10_05_B2203; source_row=44036 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The comparative salary data submitted pertained to journalists rather than editors, making it an inadequate comparison for the Petitioner's role. The employer letter claiming her salary was higher than comparable senior global editors actually provided journalist salary data, not editor data. The $60,000 offer also lacked objective comparable data for consultant editors.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The comparative salary data submitted pertained to journalists rather than editors, making it an inadequate comparison for the Petitioner's role. The employer letter claiming her salary was higher than comparable senior global editors actually provided journalist salary data, not editor data. The $60,000 offer also lacked objective comparable data for consultant editors.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-10_01_B2203; source_row=43996 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record was unclear whether there were one or two awards, the Petitioner failed to resolve the discrepancy, and neither award was shown to be nationally or internationally recognized in journalism. Additionally, two nearly identical letters from different persons undermined the probative value of the supporting evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record was unclear whether there were one or two awards, the Petitioner failed to resolve the discrepancy, and neither award was shown to be nationally or internationally recognized in journalism. Additionally, two nearly identical letters from different persons undermined the probative value of the supporting evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-10_01_B2203; source_row=43993 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c