Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 451–460
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipNot established
Case facts
Business / ManagementManagerBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Scholarly authorship
authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the book was written for a general audience, not a learned audience in business or entrepreneurship. The Petitioner himself stated the audience is individuals with a keen interest in business and that it is available on platforms carrying self-help, religion, and romance books. The publisher's own focus on happiness, leadership, and relationships confirmed it was not a scholarly publication.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the book was written for a general audience, not a learned audience in business or entrepreneurship. The Petitioner himself stated the audience is individuals with a keen interest in business and that it is available on platforms carrying self-help, religion, and romance books. The publisher's own focus on happiness, leadership, and relationships confirmed it was not a scholarly publication.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-07_02_B2203; source_row=44590 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
commanded a high salary or other significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew SCOPS' favorable finding, concluding the Petitioner had not properly documented his remuneration (the accountant's letter was not independently corroborated, and the income could not be confirmed as payment from the franchise) and the wage comparators were invalid (wrong occupation, wrong geographic area, insufficient statistical validity, or not comparable to contractor compensation).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew SCOPS' favorable finding, concluding the Petitioner had not properly documented his remuneration (the accountant's letter was not independently corroborated, and the income could not be confirmed as payment from the franchise) and the wage comparators were invalid (wrong occupation, wrong geographic area, insufficient statistical validity, or not comparable to contractor compensation).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-07_02_B2203; source_row=44593 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the 2016 and 2017 prizes could not qualify because the record lacked documentation that the Petitioner actually received them (no name on trophy, no document naming him as winner). The milestone certificates named the Petitioner but lacked selection criteria and evidence of recognition beyond the franchise itself.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the 2016 and 2017 prizes could not qualify because the record lacked documentation that the Petitioner actually received them (no name on trophy, no document naming him as winner). The milestone certificates named the Petitioner but lacked selection criteria and evidence of recognition beyond the franchise itself. Counsel's claim that the franchise's reputation imbues its awards with national/international recognition was unsubstantiated.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-07_02_B2203; source_row=44585 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Business / ManagementManagerBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputations
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner's territory comprised approximately 0.2% of Subway's 44,000+ worldwide locations, insufficient to establish significant importance to the overall organization.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's territory comprised approximately 0.2% of Subway's 44,000+ worldwide locations, insufficient to establish significant importance to the overall organization. While he may have led a regional office or national marketing board, neither was shown to have a distinguished reputation, and no organizational charts established that his positions constituted elevated leadership within the overall Subway organization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-07_02_B2203; source_row=44592 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while some required information appeared in foreign-language originals, it was not included in the translations, which is required. Additionally, two of the three articles were not about the Petitioner — he was merely one of several quoted sources.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while some required information appeared in foreign-language originals, it was not included in the translations, which is required. Additionally, two of the three articles were not about the Petitioner — he was merely one of several quoted sources. The third article lacked evidence that its publication was a major trade publication, and neither the translation nor the original included required publication, author, or date information.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-07_02_B2203; source_row=44587 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / ManagementBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The social media following comparison to academic citations was unsupported and invalid; the support letters lacked specificity about broader field impact beyond students and the local community and were authored by individuals whose expertise in early childhood special education was questionable; and the school, while locally successful, was not shown to be a contribution of major significance in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The social media following comparison to academic citations was unsupported and invalid; the support letters lacked specificity about broader field impact beyond students and the local community and were authored by individuals whose expertise in early childhood special education was questionable; and the school, while locally successful, was not shown to be a contribution of major significance in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-07_01_B2203; source_row=44581 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputations
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew SCOPS' conclusion that the Petitioner had not shown a leading role—corporate documents establish she founded the school and performed in a leading role—but affirmed the denial because the record does not establish the school has a distinguished reputation. Social media printouts, letters without basis of knowledge, and absence of academic rankings or media coverage all undermined the reputation showing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew SCOPS' conclusion that the Petitioner had not shown a leading role—corporate documents establish she founded the school and performed in a leading role—but affirmed the denial because the record does not establish the school has a distinguished reputation. Social media printouts, letters without basis of knowledge, and absence of academic rankings or media coverage all undermined the reputation showing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-07_01_B2203; source_row=44582 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
CEC, TCEC, and NASET memberships require only registration and a fee, not outstanding achievements, so none of the organizations satisfy the criterion's requirements.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
CEC, TCEC, and NASET memberships require only registration and a fee, not outstanding achievements, so none of the organizations satisfy the criterion's requirements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-07_01_B2203; source_row=44579 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
While judging through regular work duties can satisfy the criterion, the record only contains corporate documents and an org chart but no performance reviews or other correspondence showing the Petitioner judged the work of other educational entrepreneurs or allied professionals.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
While judging through regular work duties can satisfy the criterion, the record only contains corporate documents and an org chart but no performance reviews or other correspondence showing the Petitioner judged the work of other educational entrepreneurs or allied professionals.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-07_01_B2203; source_row=44580 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that substantial merit was established but found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance. The business plan's financial projections lacked supporting detail, the market data covered the industry broadly rather than the Petitioner's specific endeavor, and the projected creation of 8 jobs and modest net profit over five years did not demonstrate prospective impact rising to national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that substantial merit was established but found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance. The business plan's financial projections lacked supporting detail, the market data covered the industry broadly rather than the Petitioner's specific endeavor, and the projected creation of 8 jobs and modest net profit over five years did not demonstrate prospective impact rising to national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-07_02_B5203; source_row=44595 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c