Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 471–480
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Business / ManagementManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO affirmed SCOPS's finding that the Petitioner did not meet the original contributions criterion.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed SCOPS's finding that the Petitioner did not meet the original contributions criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-06_03_B2203; source_row=44569 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO held that merely working in an important field is insufficient for national importance, and a national shortage of physical therapists alone does not establish national importance of the endeavor under Dhanasar. DOL addresses U.S. worker shortages through the labor certification process.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that merely working in an important field is insufficient for national importance, and a national shortage of physical therapists alone does not establish national importance of the endeavor under Dhanasar. DOL addresses U.S. worker shortages through the labor certification process.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-06_03_B5203; source_row=44573 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner did not demonstrate that the potential prospective impact of his proposed endeavor stands to offer broader implications in his field or generate substantial positive economic effects, and the motion merely reargued previously considered issues.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner did not demonstrate that the potential prospective impact of his proposed endeavor stands to offer broader implications in his field or generate substantial positive economic effects, and the motion merely reargued previously considered issues.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-06_01_B5203; source_row=44560 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI2,023 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that expert letters explained significance beyond mere background use, citation data showed one 2023 paper received 207 citations versus a field average of 1.61, and acceptance by five top-rated conferences further demonstrated major importance. Contrary to SCOPS, the evidence established that the Petitioner's work served as the basis for others' research, not merely background information.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that expert letters explained significance beyond mere background use, citation data showed one 2023 paper received 207 citations versus a field average of 1.61, and acceptance by five top-rated conferences further demonstrated major importance. Contrary to SCOPS, the evidence established that the Petitioner's work served as the basis for others' research, not merely background information.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-06_01_B2203; source_row=44558 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO noted that the Petitioner's knowledge, skills, and abilities pertain to the second prong of Dhanasar rather than national importance, but did not separately adjudicate this prong given the procedural posture of the motion.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted that the Petitioner's knowledge, skills, and abilities pertain to the second prong of Dhanasar rather than national importance, but did not separately adjudicate this prong given the procedural posture of the motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-06_03_B5203; source_row=44574 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with distinguished reputation
What the decision said
AAO reserved this criterion because even if met, the Petitioner could not numerically meet the required three criteria given her failure on the membership criterion, making a ruling on this issue unnecessary.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved this criterion because even if met, the Petitioner could not numerically meet the required three criteria given her failure on the membership criterion, making a ruling on this issue unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-06_02_B2203; source_row=44565 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c