Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although AAO found the change of employment did not materially alter the proposed endeavor, the submitted documents provide only general industry information and do not demonstrate that the specific endeavor will have broader national or global implications.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
Although AAO found the change of employment did not materially alter the proposed endeavor, the submitted documents provide only general industry information and do not demonstrate that the specific endeavor will have broader national or global implications. The petitioner's intent to publish in peer-reviewed journals does not establish more-likely-than-not national impact beyond ordinary market research activities, and the endeavor's effects appear primarily confined to the employer and its clients.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-06_04_B5203; source_row=44576 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO noted that the Petitioner's education, skills, and knowledge relate to the second prong but declined to reach it because the first prong was not established and that was the dispositive issue on motion.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted that the Petitioner's education, skills, and knowledge relate to the second prong but declined to reach it because the first prong was not established and that was the dispositive issue on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-06_01_B5203; source_row=44561 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / ManagementManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with SCOPS that the record is insufficient. Company awards do not reflect the Petitioner's personal acclaim; employer letters state titles and duties but not outstanding performance; board directorship evidence was internally inconsistent; two recommendation letters contained identical language raising authenticity concerns; and the expert letter improperly relied on prospective economic impact rather than demons…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with SCOPS that the record is insufficient. Company awards do not reflect the Petitioner's personal acclaim; employer letters state titles and duties but not outstanding performance; board directorship evidence was internally inconsistent; two recommendation letters contained identical language raising authenticity concerns; and the expert letter improperly relied on prospective economic impact rather than demonstrated past acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-06_03_B2203; source_row=44572 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Policy Manual guidance that awards from well-known organizations 'may' qualify does not mean all such awards necessarily qualify, and that the number of seemingly similar award categories within just one of the organization's 13 branches undermined the claim that each award is nationally or internationally recognized.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Policy Manual guidance that awards from well-known organizations 'may' qualify does not mean all such awards necessarily qualify, and that the number of seemingly similar award categories within just one of the organization's 13 branches undermined the claim that each award is nationally or internationally recognized. Additionally, the evidence that prominent companies mention the award on their websites was insufficient given the award was listed alongside local and provincial awards, and the record did not establish how many nominees are considered each year.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-05_02_B2203; source_row=44546 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that photographs and promotional materials posted on a company's social media accounts constitute self-published promotional material rather than displays at artistic exhibitions or showcases, and that accepting the Petitioner's interpretation would render the 'artistic exhibition or showcase' requirement meaningless.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that photographs and promotional materials posted on a company's social media accounts constitute self-published promotional material rather than displays at artistic exhibitions or showcases, and that accepting the Petitioner's interpretation would render the 'artistic exhibition or showcase' requirement meaningless.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-05_03_B2203; source_row=44553 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the submitted evidence—social media screenshots, a website blurb, and an article—does not establish that the Petitioner is the recipient of a lesser nationally or internationally recognized prize or award, as required by the plain language of the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the submitted evidence—social media screenshots, a website blurb, and an article—does not establish that the Petitioner is the recipient of a lesser nationally or internationally recognized prize or award, as required by the plain language of the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-05_03_B2203; source_row=44551 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner lacked corroborating evidence of inventing or patenting the stamp crease, failed to show broad impact or utility, and that an invoice for 3,500 manufactured units does not establish major significance in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner lacked corroborating evidence of inventing or patenting the stamp crease, failed to show broad impact or utility, and that an invoice for 3,500 manufactured units does not establish major significance in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-05_03_B2203; source_row=44552 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner relied almost entirely on support letters from coworkers, and the one outside letter was from a professor lacking expertise in video game or cinematic animation. None of the game reviews mentioned the specific contributions highlighted in the support letters, and the record showed the Beneficiary was one of dozens of animators on her most prominent projects.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner relied almost entirely on support letters from coworkers, and the one outside letter was from a professor lacking expertise in video game or cinematic animation. None of the game reviews mentioned the specific contributions highlighted in the support letters, and the record showed the Beneficiary was one of dozens of animators on her most prominent projects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-05_01_B2203; source_row=44543 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c